 |
MGA News |
|
Summer 2001
|
|
A New Target for Antibodies in Myasthenia
Professor Angela Vincent
Department of Clinical Neurology
Institute of
Molecular Medicine
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
It is well recognised that most patients with myasthenia gravis (MG)
have antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, and that these antibodies are
responsible for the disease symptoms. Normally the acetylcholine receptors are
highly concentrated on the muscle membrane, where the long motor nerves
communicate with the muscle fibres that they activate (Fig 1a). In MG, the
antibodies reach the nerve-muscle junction, where they reduce the numbers of
acetylcholine receptors (Fig 1b). This means that the muscle can no longer
respond to the acetylcholine 'message' coming from the nerve, and the patients
become weak. However, for a long time we and others have realised that about
10-20% of patients with typical symptoms of MG do not have acetylcholine
receptor antibodies. We usually call this condition seronegative MG. Applying
the rules that we had learnt from studying antibodies in MG, we showed that
seronegative MG patients have antibodies, instead, against a different muscle
target. Now we have identified the target.
To give a bit more detail. Firstly, in 1986, John Newsom-Davis showed
that the seronegative MG patients got better when they were plasma exchanged;
this proved that they had an antibody in their serum that was causing their
weakness. Secondly, Stuart Mossman in our lab (at the Royal Free Hospital in
those days) injected their antibodies into mice; the mice showed weakness
compared with mice injected with antibodies from healthy people. Then a
Japanese visiting neurologist, Takeshi Yamamoto, showed in 1991 that the
antibodies could reduce the activity of the muscle acetylcholine receptors, but
recently another visiting neurologist, Franz Blaes from Germany, showed in 2000
that the antibodies were not sticking directly to the acetylcholine receptor.
As you can see, this series of experiments was performed over several years and
by a number of different researchers, but we still did not know what the target
for the antibodies was.
The breakthrough came last year, when I met a German scientist called
Werner Hoch at a basic science meeting in Germany. He had been working on a
molecule called MuSK. MuSK is another sort of receptor protein that sits on the
surface of muscle cells (Fig 1a). It is very important during development of
the nerve muscle junction, because it tells the muscle cell to start pulling
all of the acetylcholine receptors together to form a concentrated cluster (see
Fig 1a). Because MuSK controls the concentration and number of acetylcholine
receptors, we thought it would be a good candidate target for antibodies in
patients without acetylcholine receptor antibodies.
So last April we sent eight serum samples to Werner in Tuebingen and he
tested them to see whether they contained antibodies that could fix themselves
to MuSK. Five did and three did not. Excitingly, the five sera that fixed
themselves to MuSK were from seronegative MG patients and the three that did
not were all from healthy lab workers! We then used different techniques to
confirm that the antibodies in seronegative MG patients were indeed binding to
MuSK (Fig 1c), and found these MuSK antibodies in 17 out of 24 MG patients
without AChR antibodies (published in Nature Medicine in March; this is one of
the very top journals). In addition, we did not find them in MG patients with
acetylcholine receptor antibodies, showing that the two groups of patients have
a different form of MG, although they look similar in the clinic. We are now
trying to make the test for the MuSK antibody even more reliable and efficient
so that it can be used for diagnosis. That will help in sorting out the
diagnosis in many patients, and perhaps in identifying more cases
particularly in the elderly. We also need to clarify how the antibodies
actually cause the myasthenia symptoms.
MGA NEWS Summer 2001
 |